25 / 50 / 25
is the approximate population split between non-tasters, medium tasters, and supertasters — three genuinely different bitter-taste experiences from the same food.
— Bartoshuk et al., classic PROP taster research

Picture giving three people the exact same piece of raw broccoli. One shrugs — mildly vegetal, no big deal. One notices a real bitter edge but eats it anyway. One recoils like they just bit into a battery. All three are reporting their genuine sensory experience. None of them are being dramatic. TAS2R38 explains why.

The gene behind "supertaster"

TAS2R38 encodes a bitter taste receptor on the tongue that specifically detects compounds structurally related to phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) and 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) — and, critically, related compounds found naturally in cruciferous vegetables like broccoli, Brussels sprouts, kale, and cabbage, as well as in some coffee and dark chocolate. Three key positions in the gene combine into two dominant haplotypes: PAV, the "taster" version, and AVI, the "non-taster" version. Your combination of these two versions largely determines which of the three taster categories you fall into.

Non-tasters (~25%)

Typically AVI/AVI. Barely register bitterness from PROP-related compounds — a food others find unpleasant just tastes mild to them.

Medium tasters (~50%)

Usually one PAV + one AVI copy. Taste real bitterness, but at a manageable, moderate intensity.

Supertasters (~25%)

Typically PAV/PAV. Experience the same bitter compound as dramatically more intense — one study found supertasters rated rutabaga twice as bitter as non-tasters.

This isn't a vague self-reported preference — it's one of the best-replicated Mendelian taste traits in human genetics, studied for decades and confirmed across dozens of populations worldwide, with global haplotype frequencies remaining strikingly consistent even though the exact taster-category split shifts somewhat by population.

So does this explain the cilantro thing?

Not directly — cilantro's "tastes like soap" effect is more strongly linked to genes involved in smell receptors (specifically an olfactory receptor gene cluster), not TAS2R38's bitter taste pathway. But the two phenomena get lumped together for good reason: both are cases where a strong, involuntary, genetically-rooted food reaction gets mistaken for pickiness. TAS2R38 is simply the better-characterized and more thoroughly studied of the two.

It's not just about vegetables

TAS2R38 taster status has been linked to measurable differences beyond produce preference. Research has found associations between taster status and: sensitivity to alcohol's bitter component, likelihood of smoking (non-taster haplotypes were somewhat more common among smokers in some populations), and even susceptibility patterns in chronic sinus conditions — with some studies suggesting supertasters may have a lower risk of severe chronic rhinosinusitis. The taste receptor, it turns out, isn't limited to the tongue; TAS2R38-type receptors are expressed in tissue throughout the body, including the respiratory tract, where they appear to play a role well beyond flavor perception.

Worth knowing if you're a parent: A child who genuinely gags on vegetables that don't bother anyone else at the table may not be picky in the conventional sense — TAS2R38 supertaster status is inherited and shows up early. Reframing the reaction as physiological rather than behavioral can change how it's handled.

Find out which taster category you actually are

Whole genome sequencing reads TAS2R38 directly, so you don't have to guess based on how much you dread Brussels sprouts at Thanksgiving.

Get Your Whole Genome Sequenced → Use code GENOME for 10% off at Dante Labs

What to do with this

Taste isn't a personality trait. For a meaningful chunk of the population, it's a documented sensory difference written directly into a single, well-studied gene.