It depends on the service. Police can search some genealogy databases, but only those that allow it, and mostly only for users who opted in. Major testing companies such as Ancestry and 23andMe say they do not voluntarily share DNA with police and release data only under valid legal process.
Even if you never use a searchable database, a relative who does can point investigators toward your family. The leads are not proof: a match must be confirmed with a separate forensic test.
How forensic genetic genealogy works
The method is often called investigative genetic genealogy. It starts with DNA left at a crime scene or from unidentified remains, which does not match anyone in the standard criminal DNA index (CODIS). A lab turns that evidence into a genotype file of the kind consumer tests produce, and investigators upload it to a genealogy database that permits law enforcement use.
The database returns a list of users who share stretches of DNA with the evidence. Genealogists then build family trees from those distant relatives, narrow the possibilities using age, location and family structure, and arrive at a small number of candidates. Police then obtain a reference sample from a candidate, sometimes a discarded item, and run a conventional forensic test against the crime-scene profile.
The best-known example is the 2018 arrest in the Golden State Killer case. NPR reported that investigators uploaded a profile built from the crime-scene DNA to GEDmatch, found that a relative of the suspect had uploaded their own DNA, and worked outward through the family tree until a discarded item with the suspect's DNA matched.
Which services allow police to search
Policies differ, and have changed since 2018. The table summarises what we could verify in October 2026. Where a source is dated, we say so.
| Service | What the sources say |
|---|---|
| GEDmatch | Changed in May 2019 so kits are available for law enforcement matching only if the owner opts in. A 2022 survey by genealogist Judy Russell noted its terms still allow comparison of all data in human remains cases. |
| FamilyTreeDNA | Has a privacy setting for investigative genetic genealogy matching. Published accounts disagree about the default over time, so check the toggle in your own account settings. |
| Ancestry | States it does not voluntarily share user information with law enforcement, bars police from using its services to investigate crimes, and releases DNA data only under a valid search warrant. Its transparency report for January to December 2025 lists no valid requests for DNA data and no disclosures. |
| 23andMe | Described in a 2022 survey as resisting law enforcement requests and sharing only when legally required, such as under a court order, subpoena or warrant. |
| MyHeritage and Living DNA | Described in the same 2022 survey as prohibiting law enforcement use of their services in their terms. |
Terms of service can change after acquisitions, as we saw in the 2025 23andMe sale, covered in our 23andMe timeline. Reread the current policy of any service that holds your DNA.
What rules constrain police
Federal policy. The US Justice Department published an interim policy on forensic genetic genealogy, effective November 1, 2019. In summary, investigators should search only services that tell users and the public that police may use them, should identify themselves as law enforcement, and should generally focus on unsolved violent crimes such as homicides and sexual assaults or on unidentified remains thought to involve a homicide. It also says a genetic match alone cannot justify an arrest, and that a suspect must be confirmed with standard forensic DNA testing against the CODIS profile. The policy sets rules for the Justice Department itself, and other agencies follow their own practices or state law.
State law. The National Conference of State Legislatures reports that Maryland and Montana passed the first state laws on this in 2021. Each requires police to get a court order before accessing a consumer genetic database, and Maryland also limits access to databases whose users were told their data could be used for investigations. Utah followed in 2023 with a law setting when police may request a genealogy database or service, restricting arrests based on certain genetic information, and creating procedures for destroying DNA specimens and remedies for violations.
These laws are a patchwork. If you live outside those states, the main protection is the policy of the company you choose.
You do not have to test to be found
The method works through shared DNA, so a relative's upload can narrow a search toward your branch of the family even if you have never tested. That is the core privacy trade-off, and it is why one person's choice affects many. We explore the family side in your DNA is shared: how one relative's test affects the family.
What a match does and does not prove
- A match is a lead. A distant cousin match says two people share an ancestor, not that either did anything.
- Confirmation is separate. Under the federal policy, identity is confirmed by a conventional forensic test, not by the genealogy match.
- Errors in family trees happen. Records, adoptions and unreported parentage can mislead. That is one reason the confirmation step exists.
Genetic privacy law also covers other ground. The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act is about health insurance and employment, not policing, as we explain in our GINA guide.
What you can do
- Check each service's law enforcement setting or policy for every site where your DNA or raw data sits.
- Think before uploading raw data to a third-party genealogy site. It is a separate decision from taking a test.
- Talk to relatives who may upload, since their choice affects you.
- Delete what you do not need. Our guide to deleting your DNA data explains the limits.
- Ask about the policy before you buy. Add it to the list in our privacy comparison.
Bottom line
Forensic genealogy is a real investigative tool with real safeguards on paper and uneven rules in practice. Whether police can search your DNA depends mainly on which database holds it and what you chose. You can control your own settings, but not your cousins'. Choose services with clear, opt-in policies, and read the law-enforcement section before you upload anything.
Common questions
Can police get my 23andMe or Ancestry results?
Both companies say they do not voluntarily share DNA with police and release data only under valid legal process. Ancestry says it releases DNA data only under a valid search warrant, and its 2025 transparency report lists no valid requests for DNA data.
Do I have to opt in for police to search my GEDmatch profile?
Since May 2019, GEDmatch has required users to opt in before law enforcement can match against their kit. Its terms have still allowed comparison in human remains cases, so read the current terms.
Can police use a relative's DNA test to find me?
Yes, indirectly. Investigators search for relatives of the crime-scene DNA and build family trees from the matches, which can point toward people who never tested. A match must still be confirmed with a separate forensic test.
Is a genealogy match enough to arrest someone?
Not under the Justice Department's interim policy, which says a genetic match alone cannot justify an arrest. A suspect must be confirmed with conventional forensic DNA testing against the evidence profile.
Are there laws limiting police use of consumer DNA databases?
A few. Maryland and Montana passed laws in 2021 requiring a court order, and Utah passed one in 2023 covering when police may use such services. Most places rely on federal policy and company terms.
Sources and verification
Verified October 2026. Company policies change, so confirm on each service's current pages. GEDmatch, FamilyTreeDNA, 23andMe, MyHeritage and Living DNA policies come from a dated 2022 secondary survey and a 2019 report because we could not load their current policy pages. This is general information, not legal advice.
- NPR, investigators uploaded Golden State Killer DNA to a genealogy site (2018)
- US Department of Justice, Interim Policy on Forensic Genetic Genealogical DNA Analysis and Searching (effective 2019)
- NCSL, lawmakers cautious as genetic tests help crack cold cases
- Ancestry, Guide for Law Enforcement
- Ancestry, Government and Law Enforcement transparency report
- The Legal Genealogist, which services do and do not allow police access (March 2022)
- DNA eXplained, GEDmatch implements required opt-in for law enforcement matching (2019)
Medical disclaimer. GenomeTesting.org publishes educational content about genetics and consumer genomic testing. Nothing here is medical advice, a diagnosis, or a substitute for care from a qualified clinician or genetic counsellor. Decisions about testing, treatment, or interpreting your own results should be made with a healthcare professional who can see your full history.